Skip to content

From the archives

Between Words

Anne Carson’s new book-without-a-spine, and the spiritual experience of centrelessness

O Brother, Where Art Thou?

A postmodern elegy from our most original writer

Boredom as a Political Weapon

Saul Bellow fought banality—and taught us to look hard at the world

An Embryonic Debate

The importance of shedding more light than heat on stem cell research

Françoise Baylis and Jocelyn Downie

Newspapers, radio and television regularly report on scientific breakthroughs in—and public protests against— human embryonic stem cell research. Actors Michael J. Fox (who has Parkinson’s disease) and the late Christopher Reeve (who was paralyzed after a spinal cord injury) have been high-profile advocates of research to derive and study human embryonic stem cells. In the political arena, President George Bush and Senator John Kerry hotly debated embryos and stem cell research throughout the 2004 U.S. presidential election campaign. Internationally, human cloning for stem cell research has been on the agenda of the United Nations for the past several years, where discussion continues on an international convention against the reproductive cloning of human beings. In academia, embryonic stem cell research was recently and breathlessly described in the pages of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine as “the great biomedical promise of our time.” So what are we...

Françoise Baylis is a Canada Research Chair in Bioethics and Philosophy and a professor in the Departments of Bioethics and Philosophy at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

Advertisement

Advertisement