Skip to content

From the archives

Positively Shady

The glamorous activism of M.A.C Cosmetics

Muslim Pride

A timely LGBTQ memoir

Minor Hockey as Big Business

The disturbing shift from kids’ game to pricey investment

A Rich Heritage Ignored

But was the shutting out of Native art in the 1920s deliberate or just careless?

David P. Silcox

National Visions, National Blindness: Canadian Art and Identities in the 1920s

Leslie Dawn

University of British Columbia Press

456 pages

In the wake of the First World War, Canada began to shake off its colonial status and to define itself as an independent state with its own indigenous art forms. One of the enduring initiatives in this movement was the creation of the Group of Seven, officially formed in Toronto in 1920, and its legacy of defining Canada by painting the Canadian landscape, sea to sea to sea. Indeed, from this obsession we ended up with an image of Canada that emerged from Toronto studios and portrayed a suite of landscapes that few Canadians live in and most have never seen.

Pushed to one side in this process was the art of Canada’s truly indigenous peoples, the Indian tribes, with their totems, longhouses, masks, weapons, objects for rituals, beadwork, basketry and carving. Native art did not include landscape painting, and the Group of Seven did not carve masks or totems: joining these two to produce a unified image of Canada was not likely then or, perhaps, even possible. The...

David P. Silcox is the president of Sotheby’s Canada and a senior fellow at Massey College.

Advertisement

Advertisement